You know that we’re really onto something when the metaphors that we use to explain the concepts of free culture and the digital commons actually start to take on literal truth in the physical world. Here’s how I like to explain the difference between free/open source software and proprietary software (a metaphor that I’ve adapted from sources such as Neal Stephenson’s In the Beginning was the Command Line):
When you buy a computer that runs Windows, it’s like buying a car with the hood welded shut. There’s no way to tell what is under the hood. There could be a car bomb under the hood, or a leaking gas line, but there is no way for you to tell until the car explodes. A computer running open source software is like a normal car, where you can open the hood and look inside, and identify problems yourself. Even if you’re clueless about cars, you can at least change the oil, and if you’re a car hobbyist you can tinker with it, replace parts, or even hot rod the car. If you don’t have the time or knowledge to fix your own car, you can take a normal car to your mechanically inclined neighbor, or any car repair shop in the nation. With a Microsoft car with the hood welded shut, only Microsoft can diagnose and fix your problems; you have to take it to the Microsoft dealer. If Microsoft provides crappy service, that’s just too bad for you, they have a monopoly on fixing your car. Open source gives you choices. People would resent Microsoft wielding this kind of control over their car: why is it acceptable for their computers?
I’ve been using this metaphor for a while now to explain one of the benefits of the open source philosophy (choice) when it is applied to computers, but I never imagined that there was a real danger that our cars would become “proprietary”, so that only the official dealer can fix them.
Truth is stranger than fiction.
As our cars become more computerized, the battle between proprietary, closed structures and free, open structures, between Microsoft’s worldview and the Linux worldview, expands into the automotive market. As mentioned on Stephen Laniel’s Unspecified Bunker, car companies are closing off the computer interfaces that mechanics need to repair cars, and it’s destroying the business of independent mechanics.
We are standing at a critical turning point in history: either the system of proprietary control will expand to engulf everything that digital technology touches, or digital technology will result in an flourishing Internet Renaissance, where ideas can travel freely, and people are independent because they are able to help one another. It will be a sad day when we cannot help our neighbors, and when we need help we can only turn to the corporate machine and consume, consume, consume. Your iPod battery died? Buy a new iPod. Your computer has bugs and viruses? Buy the next version of Windows, we swear it’ll be more secure this time. You’re not healthy? Don’t worry about your lousy diet, just take an Aspirin and go to bed. A culture of passive consumerism is a culture of passing the buck, of refusing to accept personal responsibility.
This anti-consumerism meme may sound old and hackneyed, but the internet offers us the opportunity to actually make a change. The internet allows two-way communication to become cheaper, easier, and more convenient than ever before. We can communicate with one another in a peer-to-peer fashion, and it’s becoming easier to participate in society and culture instead of sitting on the sidelines. The position of the mere spectator is becoming harder to defend as a morally acceptable position. When it costs nothing to publish, why shouldn’t you speak with your own voice? When running an alternative to Microsoft Windows costs you nothing, and organizations like FreeCulture.org are willing to hold your hand as you take your first baby steps into the world of Linux, are you really so lazy that you can’t give it a spin? When your information sources are no longer restricted to a few channels of television, how many times can you turn your head and pretend that you just don’t see? It’s easy to be informed now, and it’s easy to band together with people from around the world and take action. It’s just hard to change habits. But it’s vital that we do change our habits, if we are to avoid a world of alienation from one another and passive withdrawal into ourselves.
That’s why we need to build a culture of freedom. When all of your habits promote freedom, and you join together with others and build a community of freedom, and other people do the same thing around the country and around the world, the result is a Free Culture. Maybe you can help us make this happen at FreeCulture.org.