<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vive la Culture Libre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Culture blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michael Geist&#8217;s new book</title>
		<link>http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Culture blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michael Geist&#8217;s new book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 07:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>[...] We usually don&#8217;t mention book releases on this blog &#8212; we don&#8217;t have anything against J.D. Lasica&#8217;s Darknet, for instance, we just weren&#8217;t sure about using our blog to plug it &#8212; whereas this is a direct follow-up to a conversation I had (and, therefore, to a previous post). The fact that it&#8217;ll be free under a CC license is a factor, too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We usually don&#8217;t mention book releases on this blog &#8212; we don&#8217;t have anything against J.D. Lasica&#8217;s Darknet, for instance, we just weren&#8217;t sure about using our blog to plug it &#8212; whereas this is a direct follow-up to a conversation I had (and, therefore, to a previous post). The fact that it&#8217;ll be free under a CC license is a factor, too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Culture blog</title>
		<link>http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Culture blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 05:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FreeCulture.org looks to expand to Canada&lt;/strong&gt;

	As I previously mentioned, FC.o is going to do a bit of Canadian outreach. We&#8217;ll be communicating with figures in Canada&#8217;s free culture movement, asking them to help spread the word about us, letting Canadian students and youth know we&amp;#82...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FreeCulture.org looks to expand to Canada</strong></p>
<p>	As I previously mentioned, FC.o is going to do a bit of Canadian outreach. We&#8217;ll be communicating with figures in Canada&#8217;s free culture movement, asking them to help spread the word about us, letting Canadian students and youth know we&amp;#82&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/#comment-438</guid>
		<description>The new law would again be giving more power to the big guys to the detriment of the public. Copyright should be a tool to promote the creation of new works, but is that really what you get when you&#039;re pushing back its expiration date ? It&#039;s what prompted me to put &lt;a href=&#039;http://copyright2005.koumbit.org/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Copyright 2005 : Copyright and you&lt;/a&gt; together (and how I met Gavin).

Bill C-60 is really the work of the culture industry&#039;s lobbying. Sure, there were consultations. Starting back in 2000-2001, the government received over 700 comments, some quite lenghty, but those were mostly dismissed. It&#039;s no surprise a petition against the nature of the bill got 2000 signatures already.

If you want to find out more, you can now listen to the &lt;a href=&#039;http://copyright2005.koumbit.org/snapshot/audio/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;audio recordings for Copyright 2005&lt;/a&gt; which have been released just a few days ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new law would again be giving more power to the big guys to the detriment of the public. Copyright should be a tool to promote the creation of new works, but is that really what you get when you&#8217;re pushing back its expiration date ? It&#8217;s what prompted me to put <a href='http://copyright2005.koumbit.org/' rel="nofollow">Copyright 2005 : Copyright and you</a> together (and how I met Gavin).</p>
<p>Bill C-60 is really the work of the culture industry&#8217;s lobbying. Sure, there were consultations. Starting back in 2000-2001, the government received over 700 comments, some quite lenghty, but those were mostly dismissed. It&#8217;s no surprise a petition against the nature of the bill got 2000 signatures already.</p>
<p>If you want to find out more, you can now listen to the <a href='http://copyright2005.koumbit.org/snapshot/audio/' rel="nofollow">audio recordings for Copyright 2005</a> which have been released just a few days ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Stark</title>
		<link>http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Stark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freeculture.org/blog/2005/07/21/vive-la-culture-libre/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Needless to say, it was interesting to hear their opinions on the bill, and get a little insight into the â€œsceneâ€? here. I think it`s fair to say that it`s not exactly the best bill that Canada could hope for; on the other hand, if it were to pass in it`s current form, it`d be a far cry from the horror it could have been.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What was the bill missing? How could it have been better (or worse)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Needless to say, it was interesting to hear their opinions on the bill, and get a little insight into the â€œsceneâ€? here. I think it`s fair to say that it`s not exactly the best bill that Canada could hope for; on the other hand, if it were to pass in it`s current form, it`d be a far cry from the horror it could have been.</p></blockquote>
<p>What was the bill missing? How could it have been better (or worse)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

