Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For Free Culture…

May 12th, 2009 by Kevin Donovan

As you undoubtedly know, President Obama has led an unprecedented era of openness in American governance, and although the record is mixed, there is much reason for hope. One of the more interesting examples of participatory government that has emerged has been the crowdsourcing of citizen input during the transistion period where Americans could submit feedback for the newly elected administration and others could vote for their favorites.

Now, the Office of Public Enagagement has published a PDF of the top suggestions (also available online). It provides a zeitgeist of sorts for the American public, and, excitingly, many of the topics are related to our work at Students for Free Culture. 

A couple commenters desired increased access to knowledge (A2K):

Libraries of all types need our support, 10810 points
“The library connects us with the insight and knowledge, painfully extracted from Nature, of thegreatest minds that ever were, with the best teachers, drawn from the entire planet and from allour history, to instruct us without tiring, and to inspire us to make our own contribution to thecollective knowledge of the human species. I think the health of our civilization, the depth ofour awareness about the underpinnings of our culture and our concern for the future can all betested by how well we support our libraries.” ~Carl Sagan, Cosmos
Carl said it best. Please continue and expand upon the support provided to libraries of all types.
– NJ Busch
and
Create an online E-Library, 8100 points
Start a program scanning the library of congress into an online library where it can be accessed for free. It would make it so much easier and cheaper for public/ school libraries to offer the people they serve quality access to knowledge. Going hand in hand with the plan already in place to drastically expand broadband lines and invest in 21st century schools, this would do much to improve American education while making it more cost effective. It would also save money and the enviornement by reducing the amount of paper purchased by the government when stocking multiple libraries with the same books.
– Kevin J. Kauth
While others pointed to the need for supporting innovation and creativity:
Focus on the Art and Creativity, 12970 points
It is always the arts that are first to be cut back in our schools and communities, yet the arts are
at the very center of creativity. This is where creative skills are born, not just for artists and musicians, but for scientists, engineers, researchers, innovators, and all thinking peoples. Now, if ever, is the time when we need creative thought and creative action to find the means and the human energy and spirit to find our way out of the problems that face us.
– Maples
and
Expand Small Business Innovation Programs, 6550 points
The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program has been providing near-term growth with long-term benefits for many years now. It is an established yet dynamic program created and administered by the federal government. 
Because the program administration and guidelines are already in place, an expansion of the program could be accomplished almost overnight, perhaps by merely generalizing a previous Executive Order (for example, 13329).
– Next Generation
Others encouraged more technology-enabled transparency:
people talking to government, 41740 points
One of the problems with politcs is that the people’s voice isn’t heard. This website is amazing! Please expand this so that people can vote on things that congress votes on. This will show congress what the constituants want. You can have the people vote on items and then show how their congress people voted on the same issue. It’s been too long that a small, disconected group of people control the lives of the US population. The American people have NOT stood up. Expand this website so that the people’s voice can be heard again. Great job with change.gov.
WE WANT MORE!
– aDAM
and
Honesty and Transparency, 45610 points
Whatever the issue — economy, energy, forgein policy, health care, homeland security, or other – it is most important that honesty and transparency guide the debate. In communicating with the American people, the President and his representatives must remain true to the principles of honesty and transparency.
– GeneL
and
Vote and debate all bills online and show what industries contribute the most to each Representatives campaign, 40080 points
Vote and debate all bills online and show what industries contribute the most to each Representatives campaign while they are voting. Let’s show the American people who really run the country!
– JimBO
Some people called for the government to provide for open technological platforms:
National WiFi, 23540 points
Internet access in the new emerging world and culture needs to be a right and not a privilage. Those who cannot afford broadband access will be left behind dispreportionately. Broadband Internet Access needs to be avalible to all Americans and most especially to those who can’t afford it. Let’s make this a priority.Further National WiFi access will broaden new business opportunities in a new emerging economy. Americans could have cell phones that have no service fees, internet access at any location and the ability to be in contact with anyone or anything instantly. The possibilites are endless.
– Jesse E
and
Restore Net Neutrality Protections to the Internet, 46220 points
During the campaign, Barack Obama pledged to “take a backseat to no one in my commitment to Net Neutrality” and to “protect the Internet’s traditional openness to innovation and creativity and ensure that it remains a platform for free speech and innovation that will revitalize our democracy.” The administration can show it’s commitment by working with the new Congress and FCC to pass laws that make Net Neutrality the cornerstone to protecting innovation, free speech and choice on the Internet.
– TimKarr
Finally, many people recognized the need to protect civil liberties, such as privacy:
Find a Balance Between US Security and Civil Liberties, 15660 points
With the reversal of many civil liberties by the Bush administration in the past eight years in the name of Terrorism, we need to find a balance between protecting our country without giving up our cherished rights as American Citizens. I am hoping a balance can be met without giving agencies carte blanche and no oversight.
– Admiralu
There are certainly points for disagreement on the particulars of these proposals, but as a general impression of the importance and widespread interest in the topics that matter to Students for Free Culture, this is an encouraging sign that the tides of public opinion are recognizing the importance of innovation, transparency, civil liberties and the role that technology can have in promoting those.
Now, it would seem, the question is what can Free Culture do for your country?
Tags: , ,

Comments (8)

Work for Creative Commons as a Software Engineer

May 1st, 2009 by Fred Benenson

As you may or may not know, Creative Commons (full disclosure: CC is my current employer) frequently looks to Students for Free Culture when hiring for openings and new positions. Right now, CC is currently employing at least 4 once-students who have been involved in SFC, so if you’re helping out with your chapter and think you’re a fit, you should definitely consider applying for the position:

Creative Commons is hiring a software engineer for our technology team, based in San Francisco. The ideal candidate would have experience in a few key areas (Python, Linux, web development) and the ability to learn quickly. Interest in the semantic web doesn’t hurt, either. We’ll begin reviewing resumes and scheduling interviews May 15, 2009.

See the job description for application details, and good luck!

Comments (0)

Reminder: Campaigning for SFC Board09 Closes in 5 Days!

March 31st, 2009 by Christina Ducruet

Hello SFC,

The campaigning period for SFC Board Elections 2009 will close at Midnight PDT on April 5.

This is a reminder to candidates to add to and finalize their bios and statements on the Nominations page.  Remember, your statement can include any information that highlights your candidacy and any other offering to the SFC constituency. Look at these prompts if you are just getting started.

Anyone in the SFC community can still add to the open list of questions, thoughts or concerns to candidates for SFC Board09.  This is a great opportunity to bring up specific issues that interest you - just make sure you take advantage while there is still time for the candidates to respond!

Voting begins on April 6, 2009 - more details to follow.

For additional information on the 2009 SFC Board Election: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Board09/Election

Comments (2)

Tim Hwang on the Changing Battlefield for Freedom Online

March 27th, 2009 by Kevin Donovan

Tim Hwang has a way of clearly articulating the path forward for Free Culture. Tim, formerly of Harvard Free Culture and now a Berkman Center researcher, recently gave a talk up at the University of Alberta that in many ways is a follow-up to his blog post prior to Free Culture 2008 that probed the future of Students for Free Culture.

In it, Tim posits that the copyfight - the effort started by Stallman, expanded by Lessig & traditionally undertaken by Students for Free Culture - is largely over. There are certainly important issues still at play in that cause, but as Tim explains in the speech here and slides below, the cause of digital freedom has evolved to include much more.

Three important changes in the digital ecosystem have given rise to new issues. In Tim’s thoughtful reckoning, cloud computing, increased bandwidth and broad web services have drastically changed the battle from one of well-structure copyright to one that involves previously unconsidered challenges including:

  • Privacy, interoperability and portability
  • Filtration
  • Access to knowledge

As he notes, the Open University Campaign has positioned SFC to deal with many of these new battles for online freedom, but as we continue to move forward, it will be important to bear in mind the lessons Tim outlines. So take a listen and chime in with your comments!

Comments (1)

Nominations Open for 2009 SFC Board Election!

March 11th, 2009 by Christina Ducruet

Hello SFC!

Nominations for the 2009 SFC Board Election have officially opened!  Please see the following details about who is eligible to be nominated, how to nominate, and what to do if you are a nominee:

Who is eligible?

In order to be a candidate for the SFC Board, nominees must either be a current member of a SFC chapter or currently serving on the Board, per our Bylaws.

How to nominate someone:

Let the person you are nominating know that you are doing so.  Then, visit the Nominations page to make your nomination official by filling out the nominee’s information using the template provided.

To accept a nomination:

Once your sponsor has added your information to the wiki, you can accept the nomination by updating your bio and statement.  In order for your nomination to be considered accepted, you must write at least “Nomination Accepted” before the close of nominations at Midnight PDT on March 20, 2009.

On campaigning etc.

Nominees will have until April 5th to add to and finalize their bios and statements on the Nominations page.  The statement is an open forum for information relevant to your candidacy and an opportunity to address questions, thoughts or concerns from the SFC community to board nominees.

Nominations close at Midnight PDT on March 20, 2009.

For additional information on the 2009 SFC Board Election, including the updated schedule: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Board09/Election

Comments (5)

Intern at Creative Commons this summer

February 27th, 2009 by Asheesh Laroia

While I am the Web Team leader at freeculture.org, I’m also a software engineer at Creative Commons. With that hat on, let me invite the students for free culture community to intern with CC in San Francisco.
Jennifer Yip writes on the main CC blog:

CC’s popular summer internship positions are now posted on the Opportunities page! We are looking for motivated students who can spend the summer at the San Francisco office to work with the staff on various projects. This year, we are offering technology, legal, international outreach, and graphic design/media development positions. Please spread the word to qualified students, or apply yourself! We are accepting applications now through March 13th.

The internship is a great way to see San Francisco, contribute your skills (be they in software, law, outreach, or graphic design) to the high-profile projects at Creative Commons. Also, a quick look through the staff page will show you that a good proportion of our current staff started as interns. We do offer interns compensation, which for me was enough to live in San Francisco for a summer and take home a little pocket money. I really appreciated applying my programming skills outside of school; suddenly, my projects don’t all disappear at the end of the semester but continue to support cause of Free Culture.

Get in touch with Jennifer if you have more questions, and be sure to apply by March 13! (You can talk to me, too, but I’ll mostly only know about the technology internship.)

Comments (0)

Last.fm: privacy invasion or site of resistance?

February 22nd, 2009 by Kevin Driscoll

Did last.fm dry snitch on you?

Last Friday, TechCrunch posted an article provocatively titled, Did Last.fm Just Hand Over User Listening Data To the RIAA?. Based on a friend-of-a-friend tip, the piece alleged that Last.fm had “handed over” user data to facilitate the identification of U2 fans with leaked copies of the band’s forthcoming album, No Line on the Horizon. (This was before Universal Music Group copped to leaking the album and U2 started streaming it voluntarily.)

Within an hour and a half - midnight for the London-based Last.fm - the allegations were debunked. Employees responded to concerned readers directly,

“[Last.fm would] never personally identify our users to a third party.”

Last.fm’s reputation is saved, TechCrunch are lying liars, the RIAA still sucks, and then I found five dollars. Right?

Not quite. Last.fm, purchased by CBS Interactive in 2007, represents the tension driving this era in computing culture, a constant negotiation of value and privacy. I’ll enrich your database by telling you how many times I’ve rewound Las Mulas De Moreno today (five and counting) and you tell me about similar artists to obsess over tomorrow.

Billboard and Soundscan look like halfblind guesswork in comparison with the charts made possible by this kind of deep data collection. Last.fm’s revenue may draw largely from advertising but if they were to start selling custom data packages to interested corporations, would anyone stop scrobbling?

Like many FCers, I was initially so alarmed at the notion that Last.fm would “hand over” user data that I ignored the fact that Last.fm’s core operations are basically in a constant state of dry snitching on its users. Want to know who is listening to “Las Mulas”? Click the Listeners tab, and start crawling profiles for identifying information.

Last.fm Listener tab

For some of us, this is reason enough to cease participation. In fact, several FC members have already begun brainstorming a non-commercial, decentralized alternative. Others propose ruining the data reported to Last.fm by deliberately spoofing the scrobbler software with falsified metadata.

But what about those FCers who use Last.fm, enjoy the services it provides, and accept its exchange of privacy for value? Do we demand they sacrifice this pleasure? To what end?

Rather than struggle against enjoyment of Last.fm, what if we were to maximize it? What would an enthusiastic embrace and exploration of a service like Last.fm reveal? Would we find its boundaries and be inspired to develop a successor with even greater capacity? Would it reveal new entrepreneurial opportunities that better protect user privacy without sacrificing the potential benefits of an enormous dataset?

Is this a positive, proactive, fanatic activism? Or surrender to an uncritical consumption?


BOOMBOX from Ely Kim on Vimeo.

Consider the case of YouTube, where thousands of people have been recently burned by spurious copyright claims. Every day YouTube users create and upload videos like the one above that incidentally infringe one or more copyrights. Quite often the videos - again, like the one above - are disabled because of a DMCA takedown notice. If the email we receive at YouTomb is any indication, these users rarely intended to flaunt the law or make a stand for free culture. Rather, they come to us confused at being disciplined for behaving in a way that felt ethically appropriate.

When large copyright holding organizations attempt to withdraw from popular web services, as Warner Music Group has done with both Last.fm and YouTube, they can no longer paint the users of those services as pirates, outsiders, or radicals as they once did with Napster and now do with the Pirate Bay. Instead, their withdrawal brands them perverse, confused, and out of step with widely accepted social practice.

What implications might this reversal have for the free culture activist?

Do we want those YouTube users to familiarize themselves with the arcane constraints of copyright law and the numerous variations we’ve made available? Or should the users be left alone and the regulatory institutions be compelled to struggle with a set of laws and expectations ill-suited to contemporary media ethics?

Imagine a free culture pro-activism that consistently supports, encourages, defends, and extends the everyday practices of users of services like Last.fm and YouTube. What might we gain through such radical participation?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments (5)

Mirror your videos; protect your rights

February 5th, 2009 by Kevin Driscoll

As YouTube’s instability continues to frustrate community members, video makers are forced to adapt. Fanvidders have been highly proactive in both anticipating and managing the constraints presented by YouTube’s copyright policy.

Initially, vidders developed codes for discussing their videos. panswendyy recounts one such strategy,

[My friend] uses the first letter of the character’s names, like B for Buffy, so if it were a Fuffy, she’d just put B/F.

Unfortunately, such codes are ineffective responses to the automated Video Identification system deployed by Google in 2007. With no voice with which to argue fair use, many users sacrifice the incomparably large community on YouTube for friendlier service elsewhere.

Before setting sail for imeem (or Vimeo, blip, dailymotion, etc), prolific YouTube users like cmspillane post videos explaining the reasons for their departure. (Ironically, because of its background music, we should expect the signoff itself to disappear.)

In response to an earlier blog post about preserving comments on disabled videos, Dean writes that YouTube might prefer that users are “unable to de-facto redirect to other versions of infringing material.” This should come as no surprise.

Mirroring videos is the most powerful immediate action that video makers can take to protect their rights as authors.

The gradual disappearance of videos from YouTube over the last 18 months progressed largely undetected because of an emergent practice distributed among thousands of community members. A few common searches reveals that the most popular videos are frequently ripped and re-upped under a variety of accounts. Like bees unwittingly pollinating a field of wild flowers, these re-ups are often executed by spammers looking for more hits on their other videos. The preservation of threatened videos is merely a by-product of their unscrupulous pursuit of views!

Moving to another service allows creators to continue practicing their craft but does little to challenge the irresponsible, wasteful industry practice of issuing copyright claims willy-nilly.

Can proactive re-upping and mirroring be an effective response to the accelerating disappearance of fanvids, remixes, home videos, and rare finds from the YouTube collection?

What would an automated mirroring / re-upping tool look like? Could YouTomb data be mobilized toward such an effort?

Remember, a DMCA takedown is not a judgement. YouTube disables access to videos based on mere claims of infringement. If you have had a video identified, the EFF wants to hear from you. Please do not let the short-sighted actions of a frightened industry intimidate you from participating in the creation of your culture!

(Cross-posted to the YouTomb blog.)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments (1)

T-Shirts, Photos, and Notes from the Board

January 19th, 2009 by Fred Benenson

DJ LONEWOLF

The Students for Free Culture board had an eventful weekend. Not only did we get a little storefront going for our fancy new shirts designed by Patrick Moberg, but we filed for incorporation, posted photos from the Free Culture Conference 2008, and sorted out some bigger plans tasks for the organization. You can read all about it in our public board notes and agenda. We’ll have some more announcements shortly (like our plans for Free Culture Conference 2009 and elections), so keep your eyes peeled.

Comments (3)

Why Free Culture News exists

November 28th, 2008 by Clifford Owens

A discussion came up lately about what the difference is between this blog and Free Culture News.  FCNews describes itself on its about page:

Free Culture News is a project of Students for Free Culture and is a blog devoted to happenings in the world of free culture.

There are many sites dedicated to free software, a few to free content, a few to open educational resources, a few to patent law, etc, but there does not seem to be any one definitive resource to go to for general free culture news.  We aim to be that resource.

Keeping our posts minimal and frequent, and pointing to other sources, we try to bring the news as efficiently as possible.

FCNews calls itself “a project of Students for Free Culture” so it’s often confusing why we have two blogs.  One is for news, and the other for…more news?  Before I talk about the differences, let me give a brief history of FCNews.

FCNews sprung out of Free Culture at Virginia Tech, the SFC chapter at Virginia Tech (I’m the chapter head there).  It initially existed as the FC@VT meeting wiki.  My members would post links to news, and because they were not required to write their own analysis, or go through quality control loops they would post a lot of links. It was a wonderful resource because nothing like it really existed, only blogs pertaining to specific areas of free culture.  I read 50+ feeds devoted to free video games, legal battles with the RIAA, etc. and it was really nice to have our wiki as an alternative to that.  Not only could you get all news pertaining to free culture in one place, but you avoid getting tons of articles not related to free culture (eg: Boing Boing and Slashdot are great places to get news about free culture, but for every bit of relevant news, you get a lot of things not really related, and only reading some sections or following some tags usually makes you miss good stuff).

We decided that even though it would require a little more work, we wanted to share that resource with the rest of the world in a nice format.  Thus FCNews was born.

So what exactly are the differences?

Subject matter: SFC’s blog is generally written about SFC as an organization or about events that relate to free culture and education.  It’s not strictly tied down to these matters, but we try to keep it focused on students and on this organization.  FCNews covers free culture in general, meaning it won’t mention everything you find on this blog (because the focus may be too specific), but it will also mention lots of things you don’t find on this blog (because it doesn’t have much to do with SFC as an organization, or to education).

Originality: SFC’s blog consists primarily of original content and in-depth analysis.  FCNews relies heavily on block quotes as to keep the author’s work minimal.

Content length: SFC’s blog contains fairly lengthy articles.  FCNews keeps posts very short and provides the reader with links if they want to investigate further.  A reader of FCNews could read 10 posts in a fairly short amount of time.

Quality: SFC’s blog has a requirement of peer review.  This post will be sent into the hands of another to be proof-read, edited, polished, and handed to you in pristine condition.  It is held to a high editorial standard.  For the sake of speed, and to encourage contribution, every regular poster at FCNews posts without consulting anyone else.  You will find more spelling errors and grammar mistakes there than you will here.  At FCNews, we find the trade-off agreeable.

Frequency: SFC’s blog’s ideal frequency is one post every 1-3 days.  FCNews’ ideal frequency is 3-5 posts in one day.  Neither are really ideal at the moment, but you get the point.

Authorship: SFC’s blog is written by students, and though it wouldn’t mind having a guest blogger occassionally, plans on staying a student-written blog.  FCNews is also currently written by students, but we are open at any time for people outside of the organization becoming regular posters.

Hopefully that answers any questions that you may have had about the differences. The decision between keeping FC@VT news links on our wiki, making our own blog, and writing full articles for the SFC blog was something that was not decided lightly and involved a good deal of discussion.  There was some disagreement when the decision was made, but I think things turned out for the better this way.

So if you have some new and cool news pertaining to education and free culture, where should you post it?  If you just want to quote-and-link, head over to FCNews.  If you want to write a nice well-thought out analysis, post it here, and if it’s of interest to the general public, quote and link yourself on FCNews.  (Or maybe we will do that part without you!  ;) We can be pretty quick sometimes.)

Tags: ,

Comments (1)