“We call upon public libraries around the world to remove the unethical Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) technologies currently locking down many of their digital collections. DRM compromises public trust for the sake of providing limited access to popular works to some in the short-term. As concerned patrons, we request that libraries immediately establish policies against the use of DRM technologies.

DRM requires users to cede control of their computers to third-party corporations, so they can restrict when and how they may access “checked out” books or audio files. This is an inappropriate and unethical requirement for a public library to impose on its patrons. The notion of checking something out is based on physical scarcity — to be manufacturing scarcity where none exists is entirely contrary to a library’s mission.

Libraries that use DRM are submitting patrons to the onerous and unethical legal terms involved with purchasing, installing, and using software such as Microsoft Windows and the Windows Media Player. In the case of Microsoft Windows, this entails agreeing to terms that allow Microsoft to delete software and data that the user legally owns and has created or installed on their own machines. For a library to require their patrons to agree to such End User License Agreements as a prerequisite for gaining access to its collection is an injustice.

These software requirements drive the sales of DRM technology vendors, such as Microsoft and OverDrive, providing an incentive for patrons to discontinue using software and materials that do not impose DRM. The common argument that DRM and proprietary software are necessary because publishers require them becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, because the library is using its own market power to encourage their use, hurting the emergence of competing alternatives in the process.

Random House, the largest publisher of eBooks and audio books worldwide, recently announced its decision to drop DRM from the vast majority of its catalog. Random House made this decision after doing a study which found zero cases of DRM-free works being shared illegally. They found that it was ONLY the DRMed titles that were being shared.

The fear, uncertainty, and doubt used by the software industry to convince publishers and distributors to use DRM has blindsided the public and institutions of public trust. Little consideration has been given to the ethical and long-term implications of accepting and encouraging the use of DRM. Defending the public interest means thwarting DRM.

For these reasons, we ask that libraries immediately embargo the use of DRM on their collections and establish formal policies against it. There are undoubtedly many challenges facing libraries today that need to be considered, but few can be as timely or as important as the way the library defines itself and its role in our digital age.”

Personally, I’m not sure about how libraries, especially academic ones, are going to react to this proposed ‘embargo.’ Kicking DRM to the curb is an idea that I agree with wholeheartedly, but many of the licensed resources such as Scholarly Journals, have a pretty vivid history of inflexibility in regards to DRM as a means of protecting their products.

This is definitely something to keep an eye on in the very near future, as well as a topic that Students for Free Culture might take a public stance on. I’ll post whatever I find that’s of interest!

PS: Check the pic of Gavin I nicked from Wikipedia’s DRM page…

~Excelsior!

• Board Meeting 04-27-2008
• Board Meeting 03-08-2008

We’ll be updating this page on the wiki: Meetings with future links to minutes so keep an eye out there if you’re interested in following SFC’s board meetings in excruciating detail.

But if you’re not interested in digging through the minutes here are a couple of things we’ll be working on over the next couple of months:

• New T-Shirts are on their way.The wonderful Patrick Moberg of BustedTees has graciously agreed to create some new art for shirts that we’ll be printing soon. He’s done a great job and the designs are almost done, so we’ll be releasing more info about that soon. We should have the t-shirts printed and ready by the end of the summer.
• The Fall 2008 Students for Free Culture Conference. Mark your calendars for October 10th-13th 2008 as we’ve scheduled Columbus Day weekend for our next big conference. We’ve chosen Berkeley, CA as the location for the summit and we’ll be raising funds to make sure we get the right people there to learn, help, and grow the organization and their chapters.
• Incorporation. Thats right, you heard it here first. SFC will soon be an official non-profit entity. This will allow us to file for 501c3 status and solicit tax free donations. Creative Commons‘ original counsel Diane Cabell has been an enormous help through this process and we should be done with it soon.

As always, please feel free to contact anyone on the board, or leave a comment here if you’d like to give feedback about our ideas.

Thanks & Good luck with finals!

Read a summary here

See the full text here (PDF)

The EFF has this to say about the legislation (House Passes Controversial PRO IP Act):

“The most outrageous provisions would create new and unnecessary federal bureaucracies devoted to intellectual property enforcement. None seems more ridiculous than language creating a Cabinet-level “IP enforcement czar” that would report to the President and coordinate enforcement efforts across government, a proposal that has been loudly opposed by the Department of Justice.”

In a time when many public University systems are facing huge budget deficits (for example, the University of California faces a $400 million deficit), is creating a new layer of federal IP enforcement a useful allocation of funds?  Especially when the proposed legislation has been criticized by the very people it directs.  Rather than using funds to relieve financial stress in education, or any other strained public service, the 110th Congress has chosen to help organizations like the RIAA and MPAA fortify their own warped IP ideologies.

Stay tuned for more updates and analyses.

Demographics

Virginia Tech is one of our several technology-centric chapters, founded by people who are interested in open source software and who run Linux. Due to poor representation of women among the computer-science-y demographic, Virginia Tech also suffers from a lack of ladies, although there were two female members present while I was there. As our chapters have matured and broadened their scope to cover more issues, they have drawn in many other sorts of people from different walks of life. Many of our newer chapters were founded by people (many of them women) who are more interested in art and remix culture for example, or in open access publishing and access to knowledge. Apparently VT had a member who joined because of his interest in music, and who was involved with the radio station and was putting together an FC radio program of some sort, but who dropped out of the chapter due to personal reasons. Free Software is the primordial soup from which the broader Free Culture movement emerged, however, and Linux users and open source advocates will always be one of our core constituencies. That’s perfectly fine, as long as they’re not the only people involved!

I encouraged the FC @ VT folks to try to do events and activities that target different demographics than their own, and it seems likely they’ll do more to expand their appeal next school year.

Frets on Fire

On the other hand, open source software is pretty darn awesome! Above is a picture of me playing Frets on Fire towards the end of the FC @ VT meeting. Frets on Fire is an open source clone of Guitar Hero, which can use either actual Guitar Hero guitar peripherals, or any keyboard you might have lying around. It’s more entertaining to watch someone play guitar on a computer keyboard ;-) Given that the music industry has decided that Rock Band is a new way to release music and make money from licensing, it’s great that open source efforts like Frets on Fire give anyone the power to release their music as a track that people can play, or for fans to transcribe the music of their favorite band…. it’s problematic if the only way to release such interactive music is with the permission of Harmonix or RedOctane.

Frets on Fire is impressively pretty and plays well, and it’s a good sign I think that an open source project which requires the skills of programmers, musicians, graphic designers etc. can be so successful. Let’s face it, in the digital age many creative endeavors now require software and programmers, and open source software will only become more important. It’s great to tie it into music and art with projects like Frets on Fire.

Choice of meeting space, equipment

Although my talk took place in a larger lecture hall, FC @ VT apparently normally has its meetings in this smaller classroom in the computer science department. I know that chapters don’t necessarily get to choose where they meet, as sometimes they have to simply make do with whatever space is available, but a chapter’s meeting space definitely affects the feel of a meeting, so it’s definitely worth considering what you want your chapter’s meetings to be like. The circular arrangement of the seating in this room lent the meeting something of an egalitarian, communal aura, which I liked.

It’s also important to make sure that the room has all of the equipment and furniture that you want. In this case the room had a screen and a projector, although unfortunately the projector decided not to cooperate that day, so they had to substitute a large computer monitor from next door. Testing equipment ahead of time is essential! The chapter members informed me that they have been doing a number of showings of public domain movies on campus, but they used to have serious trouble with the showings because they would download the movies from Archive.org and the downloads would sometimes be corrupted or incomplete, and they would not discover this until the showing itself. Now one of them tests all of the media that they want to use well before the day of the public event. If this had been a public event, hopefully they would have tested the projector before the event as well ;-)

Group discussion, per the wiki agenda

As the circular seating arrangement might have suggested, one of the main items on the agenda was a group discussion, about news in the free culture realm. Talking about the free culture issues in the news is really important, both to keep your members up to date and informed, and to debate and wrestle with various ideological and ethical problems that may arise… it’s good for everyone to know the issues inside and out. Unfortunately, sometimes chapters can get so wrapped up in the business of organizing activities that they never get a chance to think and discuss, and at that point it’s sometimes good to get less ambitious and slow things down a bit. How will you ever get new recruits up to speed, or keep them interested, if you’re just working all the time?

What made the discussion especially interesting to me is that all of the topics had been written down in the agenda for the meeting, on the chapter’s wiki. Here’s the agenda for the meeting I attended after my talk. Students for Free Culture provides free mailing lists, blogs, and wikis to our chapters, and each chapter uses its webspace differently. Some chapters do not use a wiki at all, and the ones who do use it have very different styles. The way we used the wiki at Free Culture Swarthmore, and what I recommend to each chapter when we give them a wiki, is to create a wiki page for each meeting, collaboratively write the agenda for the meeting on that page beforehand, and then take minutes on the same page during the meeting.

I must say, however, that I don’t recall ever putting FC news / group discussion topics on the agenda for meetings at my chapter. Normally there’s a lot more work/business on the agenda, and the VT members noted that their agendas usually have more business on them as well, but since it’s the end of the semester there wasn’t much left to do. Even more interestingly, they actually commented on the agenda items a bit on the wiki before they even arrived at the meeting, treating it like a forum. This made everything very well organized, and everyone had the facts right at their fingertips in the forms of the relevant news articles etc. while they were talking. The funny thing was that with such a detailed agenda that many of the members had obviously looked over and commented upon before the meeting, there wasn’t really much of a need for minutes, and they dispensed with minutes almost entirely at this meeting, only taking a few notes at the end of the agenda during the “open floor” section. This may be a model worth replicating at a chapter near you!

Showing a documentary in pieces

FC @ VT had another innovation that I had not seen before, in the way that they showed documentaries during their meetings. They decided that they wanted to watch Good Copy Bad Copy during their meetings, but that they didn’t want to devote an entire meeting to just sitting and watching a movie. Also, their attention spans were likely to give out before the end of an hour-long documentary ;-) So instead of watching the movie all at once, they split it into 15 minute sections and watched it serialized, one section at each meeting. We were watching the third out of four sections the day I was there, and indeed most everyone seemed to be paying attention pretty much the whole time, occasionally making remarks about what was on the screen. Once the section was over, they had a brief discussion afterwards as well. As long as you don’t forget what happened the last week, this seems like a perfectly reasonable way to show a documentary for a club which meets weekly.

Also, I highly recommend Good Copy Bad Copy, it’s quite entertaining! My main complaint is that since much of the movie takes place in other countries, much of the dialogue is in subtitles, and the subtitles are a little hard to read. I recommend showing this movie on a large screen under ideal movie-showing conditions, otherwise you’ll be straining your eyes to read the darn subtitles. (Hint: a far-away computer monitor is not ideal.)

EFF decoder rings

Some people do not understand the EFF decoder rings or why we included them in the care packages. To be honest, the EFF just sent us a truckload of the things, and we ended up using them as packing peanuts to get rid of them. It’s fascinating how the decoder rings have been a smash hit on some campuses, such as UW Madison and Virginia Tech, and left others completely befuddled.

In case you are among the confused, let me explain the point of the decoder rings clearly: There is a spinny thing on each decoder ring, and on one side of the spinny thing you can see a number, and on other side a letter. In order to encode some text, you spin the ring until you see the letter you want to encode, and then you write down the number that you see on the opposite side of the ring. To decode text, you simply reverse the process, searching for the number that is encoded, and then writing down the letter that it is paired with. The reason that the decoder rings say “Circumvention Device” on them is because they are a subtle dig at the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, which included “anti-circumvention provisions” that made it illegal to circumvent encryption on copy-protected content, e.g. to decode the scrambled data on a DVD without permission, and it also made it illegal to distribute “circumvention devices” which make it possible for people to e.g. back up their DVD collection (resulting in tools like DVD X-Copy being driven off the market). Theoretically the DMCA could even make these decoder rings illegal, although it is unlikely that a copy protection scheme would ever use a simple rotation algorithm to encode the content. The DMCA anti-circumvention provisions embody serious threats to freedom of expression, scientific research and security research, academic freedom, and other important rights.

Now that I’ve explained the joke to you, it’s probably no longer funny, but crucially it seems that many people at chapters like Virginia Tech are either (1) geeky and well-informed enough to know what the DMCA is and get the joke, or (2) really excited about the idea of decoder rings, regardless of their purpose or why they are there. It’s nice to see people who have enough of their inner child left to appreciate nifty but practically useless little widgets like these decoder rings, and I’ve seen a number of chapter members passing ring-encoded messages to one another, both in person and online. While we are saving the world, let us not forget how to have a good time. 18-12 _ 25-7-11 _ 20-3-17 _ 1-8-3-4 _ 14-5-18-15 _ 25-7-11 _ 1-7-20-6!

This past fall, one student organization has risen to face this monster. They call themselves Free Culture at Virginia Tech. Touting a name that makes most other students wonder what the heck their group does and whether or not it has anything to do with nudist colonies, they fight nonfreedoms as best they can. They have shown public domain movies in partnership with the Virgina Tech Union, given away CDs of free music, played Frets on Fire before meetings, and toyed around with XOs.

Occasionally, The Hideous Beast becomes too much for them, and they have to call in for help. This past month, Richard Stallman visited, and confronted it through means of speech. Shoeless, and sockless, he dealt the beast a mighty blow.

Tomorrow, Wednesday 23rd, on the 4th anniversary of the founding of Students for Free Culture, Nelson Pavlosky will be visiting to do battle. If you should happen to be in Blacksburg, VA, come join us at 6:00pm in Pamplin 30, and see Nelson help us free Hokie culture!

~That’s me on the far left in the picture below~

Q: How did you get into free culture in the first place? What made you want to start a chapter?

I got interested in free culture issues long before i knew that an organization like this even existed. In 2004 I was taking a class at App State in North Carolina (my undergrad Alma Mater) called Art & Ideas that examined some of the philosophical questions pertaining to the art world. It was around this time that Dangermouse’s Grey Album came out, and i ended up framing my final paper for the class around the fair use issues that the work brought up. From there, i discovered the long-dormant illegal-art.org, John Oswald, Negativland, Fensler Films (the fine gentleman who brought us the GI JOE PSAs) and so many other mash-up artists that were creating new and challenging derivative works from the copyrighted flotsam and jetsam of pop culture. From there, i got interested in sampling laws which ended with me falling in love with hip-hop culture. I eventually wrote my undergrad thesis on the roots of that very culture, making sure to comment in the ways that DJs are recontextualizing old works for new ears.

I spoke this Saturday at the brand spanking new Students for Free Culture chapter at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, along with former SFC board member and co-founder of our U Florida chapter, Gavin Baker. We were both guest speakers at a symposium called Culture of Sharing, where we also led breakout sessions (mine was on Open Source and ended up being a free software installfest) and co-hosted a post-conference workshop on how to start and operate a Students for Free Culture chapter. Our UW Madison chapter’s co-founder, Angela, was kind enough to take notes for the chapter-starting workshop and send them to us, so some of that material may end up in a “how to start a chapter” kit someday. It resulted in a short article in campus newspaper The Daily Cardinal and positive blog coverage on sites like the UW infolit Community, and a good time was had by all :)

If you’re from UW Madison and you’d like to join their chapter, you should sign up for their mailing list.

Here’s a picture of me and Gavin with the founding members of the UW Madison chapter. From left to right: Chris, Justine, me (Nelson), Angela, Gavin, and Hannah on the bottom.

Some of the new UW Madison recruits expressed some interest in guest-blogging, so if we’re lucky you may see some of them on here in the near future!

Here are some pictures of us making the care packages if you’re curious.

If you’re wondering exactly what is in the packages, the care packages include material from: The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Creative Commons, Public Knowledge, The Free Software Foundation, and SPARC. We won’t tell you exactly what’s in them, that would spoil the surprise, but we promise it will be fun and educational ;-) Thanks to all of our allies for their support!

Also, thanks to Gavin Baker formerly of our UF chapter, Kevin Donovan from our Georgetown chapter, and Herbert from our Swarthmore chapter for helping to package the materials, and thanks to my father Robert for helping me finally ship the darn things.

As the bylaws state, Students for Free Culture is supposed to have a Core Team. The Core Team is the people who make all the decisions in the org that are too low-level for the Board and require more frequent meetings–i.e. whether or not we should sign on to a petition, what our next national campaign should be, what projects we should direct our volunteer efforts toward, etc.

Becoming a voting member of Core Team is pretty easy. You must 1.) be a member of a SFC chapter and 2.) attend two consecutive meetings. (See the bylaws for more info)

Obviously, we haven’t had any meetings yet, so there won’t be any binding votes taken at the first meeting. However, we’ll be talking about our goals for the semester and getting pending issues out on the table so we can vote on them at the second meeting. We’ll also be starting to think about who should be the chair and vice-chair of the Core Team so we can get that out of the way soon.

It should be noted that Core Team meetings are *NOT* for making assignments/volunteering, except perhaps for the simplest, easiest tasks (e.g. “Christina, could you email Helpful Partner Org to inform them that we have decided to sign on to their campaign?”). This is partly to keep the meetings focused and partly a reflection of the fact that Students for Free Culture benefits from the volunteer work of many people who are not members of chapters and thus ineligible to vote. However, I expect that many Core Team members will be participants and leaders in Volunteer Team meetings as well. Thus, Volunteer Team meetings will take place after each Core Team meeting, plus additional meetings when appropriate. (More on that later, perhaps after this first Core Team meeting.)

See you all on Monday in IRC!

Let me also thank Benjamin Mako Hill for letting us use his Selectricity software. You can read his acknowledgments here.

Our five board members are:

• Elizabeth Stark
• Fred Benenson
• Brendan Ballou
• Christina Ducruet
• Kevin Driscoll

Mako explains further:

We used preferential voting, requiring each voter to rank the candidates in order of his preference. We then tallied the votes using the Schulze method, also known as Schwartz Sequential Dropping. The basic idea behind the use of a preferential system is to select the candidates who optimize for the preference within the group — rather than only picking the candidates with the most number one votes who might simply be more polarizing.

Results for the election are available in now in Selectricity as is a more detailed breakdown of the election system we used that shows which candidates were preferred to each other — and by how much. Voters can also check details of the election which includes a list of voters who participated, a published list of votes, and (using a verification token voters received while voting), the ability for voters to verify that their own vote was recorded correctly without compromising anonymity.