Archive:Board10/Nominations

From FreeCulture.org
Revision as of 07:34, 30 April 2010 by Oo7akbnd (talk | contribs) (Statement)
Jump to: navigation, search

Nominations to Run for the Board of Directors

According to the Bylaws, nominees for the Board of Directors must either be a current member of an FC chapter or currently serving on the Board.

Reminder, nominations close at Midnight PDT on April 30, 2010.

Timeline

Nominations are accepted through April 30. Between April 30 and May 10, candidates will answer questions from the community and participate in one live Q/A session.

Chapters will receive e-vote tokens by email on Monday, May 10th, and must cast their votes by Friday, May 14. The results will be announced on Monday, May 17th.


How to nominate someone

  1. Contact that person.
  2. Edit this page and copy-paste the template below.
  3. Complete the information to reflect your nominee.

What to do if you are nominated

  1. Wait for your sponsor to add you to this page.
  2. Update the Bio and Statement sections below your name.

List of Nominees

(in alphabetical order, by last name)

Last Name, First Name, Chapter

  • Nominated by ...

Bio

Statement

Donovan, Kevin

  • "Nominated by Parker Phinney"
  • Nomination declined

Bio

Statement

Driscoll, Kevin

  • "Nominated by Kevin Donovan"

Bio

Statement

Ducruet, Christina

  • "Nominated by Parker Phinney"

Bio

Statement

Fassina, Andrea

  • "Nominated by Ben Moskowitz"
  • Nomination accepted

Bio

Statement

Higgins, Parker

  • "Nominated by Parker Phinney"
  • Nomination accepted

Bio

I'm a graduating senior from NYU's Gallatin School of Individualized Study, where I've constructed a major in Creativity, Free Speech, & Intellectual Property. I joined NYU's Free Culture chapter after reading Lessig's book heading into my freshman year, and subsequently served as its treasurer and then president. I currently serve on the SFC board, and thus assisted with the planning of the February "Free Culture X" conference.

Statement

The board this year has made some important progress: official incorporation in my home state of California, steps taken to 501(c)3 status, and strategizing future goals about the form and structure of the organization. We've received contact from dozens of prospective chapters, and have opened up discussions with many of them about establishing SFC presence at their institutions. I'm proud of the work we've done this year, and I think there's a lot that still remains.

As Parker (Phinney) wisely points out, none of the candidates here are going to be real outliers in terms of philosophy or approach. This organization consistently selects great candidates, and I'd be happy with any five of those nominated. That said, I think there's some important points to make and some important qualities I offer to the position.

  • We need to revamp our new chapter registration system so that the interest we're receiving can really be channeled into the actual establishment of chapters. We need to have a way to keep in contact with new or unstable chapters and provide support. This may be an intraorganizational movement, as I believe the best advice new chapters can receive is from more veteran chapters.
  • I support the idea of hiring a staffer to help with that process. As we continue along the 501(c)3 road, we're becoming more credible to raise grant money and have a real budget as an organization. With a hired gun, as it were, we could make sure that somebody is paying attention to new chapters, and providing all chapters with some level of institutional support.

I think it's important that at least some of this year's board remains in place for next year. We've started a lot of great things in motion, and I'm afraid that it would be difficult for five new board members to follow all of the strings. Of course, each of the individuals nominated is a capable person and would be able to figure things out, but I'd hate to see our progress set back because of too much churn.

Kamdar, Adi

  • "Nominated by Ben Moskowitz"
  • Nomination accepted

Bio

I'm a sophomore at Yale University, where I'm trying to create a Science, Technology, and Society major, but if that doesn't work, I'll probably be a History of Science, History of Medicine major. I first got involved with Free Culture in high school with the chapter that Parker Phinney started up, and I started up the Yale chapter at the end of last school year. Since then, it has grown from pretty much a five person operation to a much, much bigger setup, with around 20+ dedicated members, and hundreds of affiliated folks. We've hosted many events this year, including three that had 100 to 250 people in attendance. We've also gained international attention, with our activism being picked up by the BBC, NPR, HuffPo, Slashdot, and more. We've also made headway with an Open Access initiative, helping with an OA repository and spearheading a senior thesis repository. I also worked with the Open Video Alliance, interning with the Open Video Conference and blogging for the remainder of the year. I'll be working at the Berkman Center this summer.

Statement

Basically, I've been very fortunate to have access to some of the biggest names in this movement, which has helped spur the growth of my school's chapter of SFC. We've held events, spread awareness, been on the news, stirred some controversy——but mainly only within the yale sphere. If you asked a majority of the members of our group about the international Students for Free Culture organization, you'd get blank stares.

There's a disconnect, and it needs to be bridged. Fixing this needs to address the importance of the movement as a whole and provide chapters with ways to contribute/get involved. We need something like...

  • Monthly state-of-the-movement emails. These should be easily forwardable and in plain speak. This should help get the word out about recent issues, cool things happening at different chapters, cool ideas for events, and more. The most important thing, in my opinion, is that these should be accessible by a good amount of the population... technical ideas and jargon should be explained, but the audience shouldn't be treated like babies.
  • Big group / small group connection. Chapters should report in, and the bigger group should check in. We do a lot of cool stuff, but a lot of times we forget to let the world know.
  • Generic resources and events-in-a-box. There should be one page or half page sheets addressing things like open access, net neutrality, "is free culture piracy?" and more. These should be easily modifiable, printable, and accessible to the layperson. Also, event ideas: like Parker Phinney noted, things like movie screenings of FC-related films are EASY. Pages with basic ideas and premade propaganda should exist.
  • Chapter sustainability advice. How to attract members, how to keep members, how to organize members, how to make mailing lists and which should be used for what, how to get your name out, how to be sexy, how to appeal to the layperson, how to appeal to faculty. All of this is important to the health of the chapter, and I think basic advice will prevent the current situation where some of our most active chapters are one-man operations.

And some broader thoughts:

  • General user friendliness. If you can't tell, I'm all about accessibility and approachability, which I believe has helped our chapter skyrocket. Maybe this is because I don't come from a very technical background, but being able to convince people requires being able to connect with people on their level. Our movement is already laden with jargon that is hard to approach, and if people are to care, they're going to need to be able to understand.
  • Website should feature issues, news, chapter updates, etc. Basically, what it's supposed to be now, but actually working. There should be a reason to go to the website. (Also, the chapter list should be cleaned up.)

Moskowitz, Ben

  • "Nominated by Kevin Donovan"

Bio

Statement

Phinney, Parker

  • "Nominated by Ben Moskowitz"
  • Nomination accepted

Bio

I'm a sophomore at Dartmouth, majoring in Computer Science. I first became involved in Students for Free Culture a little less than four years ago (back then it was freeculture.org), when I was so inspired by Cory Doctorow's Toorcon Keynote speech that I emailed him to ask how a young student could get involved. Since then I've had the pleasure of founding two SFC chapters (one at my high school and one at Dartmouth), leading the web team, attending the two most recent (2008 and 2010) Free Culture conferences, and serving as vice-chair on the now-defunct "core team." I interned at Creative Commons in San Francisco last summer and worked in Philadelphia this past Winter with SFC alumni Asheesh Laroia and Raphael Krut-Landau on the Free/Open-Source community website OpenHatch.org. My activism at Dartmouth for the past year and half has been focused on working with students, faculty, and staff to create a Dartmouth OpenCourseWare initiative. Also, I enjoy long walks on the beach.

Statement

From conversations with the other candidates at the conference this past winter, as well as some more recent conversations with a few of the candidates, I can say that we don't disagree on much.

  • We need more support for small chapters, particularly the smaller ones.
    • The global organization (perhaps the Board, perhaps a re-instated Core team) needs to check in with chapters periodically to ask what successes they have had and what challenges they are facing and then to offer advice.
    • The global organization needs to provide "packaged" events to chapters, so that they can easily have programming with little preparation. Again, this is particularly true for smaller chapters. Last year's screenings of RiP: A Remix Manifesto are a great example--students only needed to sign up in order to receive a DVD copy of the film and posters to put up around campus.
  • We need a paid staffperson to hold the organization together. This staffperson would fill in the cracks on tasks such as answering emails and phone calls, checking in with chapters, and interfacing with other organizations to solicit funding or other support (advertising, space), especially in relation to organizing the annual conference.
  • We need more dynamic website content and mailing list conversations to tell the world that we are active, and to inspire each-other to do more awesome work.
    • The guest blogging series on the Google Book Search settlement did a great job of this.
    • As part of periodic check-ins, chapters should be encouraged to report back after successful events and campaigns, giving the community pointers and resources (posters, email templates) for holding similar events and running similar campaigns

One thing that sets me apart somewhat from the other candidates is my technical knowledge. That's not to say that I'm necessarily less equipped with the skills that are more specific to leading an organization of activists. How to Win Friends And Influence People and Rules for Radicals are the two most recent items on my reading list. Nonetheless, a great deal of good can be done for our organization by simply improving our software. For example, we lose a nontrivial number of potential chapters to our cumbersome chapter database system. I don't hope to solve all of our software problems my self--I plan to ask for help from the web team and perhaps to find funding to contract a freelance developer. Having a more tech-oriented and specifically web tech-oriented member on the board would greatly improve the process of translating our organizational goals in to the right software solutions.

Rajaram, Aditi

  • "Nominated by Ben Moskowitz"
  • Nomination accepted

Bio

Statement

Questions, Thoughts, Concerns

This is a space for any FC member to post thoughts to provoke and guide the statements of board nominees.

  • Where is SFC in May 2011? What are the discrete steps to get there?
  • What's your strategy (if any) to get funding for a full-time SFC director?

Past Nominations