Difference between revisions of "Archive:Discussion 2: Code, Freedom, and Control"

From FreeCulture.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(+questions)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Any time we talk aout goin gafter proprietary media, ew also ened to talk about going after MS and Apple, the companies that make tech that enables these restrictions to be used.  We think software is the lens through which a lot ofa rt is viewed now.  If you are making art that depends on proiprietary software to be appreciated, it is like what RMS used to call the Java trap...
 
Any time we talk aout goin gafter proprietary media, ew also ened to talk about going after MS and Apple, the companies that make tech that enables these restrictions to be used.  We think software is the lens through which a lot ofa rt is viewed now.  If you are making art that depends on proiprietary software to be appreciated, it is like what RMS used to call the Java trap...
 +
 +
We really rely on volunteer help. If you're doing something along these lines, we'd love to promote that as well.
 +
 +
Q - is there any reason to use Vista?
 +
: A - they do try to market DRM as a feature; if you want to have a 'next-generation content experience' you need to run Vista.
 +
 +
Q - what is the novelty in the DRM used in Vista?  Maybe ther eare other mac usersw in the audience who don't know that.
 +
: A - they do a lot more signing of the driver,s controlling video output; there are more interfaces b/t the software and the hardware.  This is why many peopl eneed to upgrade hardware to run Vista; they extend the scheme farther into hardware than it was before.  The HD vid technologies also are enabled in Vista with restrictions (down to the hardware level).
  
 
=== Refs ===
 
=== Refs ===

Revision as of 16:51, 26 May 2007

John Sullivan, Free Software Foundation

It's not alright to let MS off the hook b/c others might have worked with big media to enable DRM. If MS had said no, who eles would big media have gone to?

Any time we talk aout goin gafter proprietary media, ew also ened to talk about going after MS and Apple, the companies that make tech that enables these restrictions to be used. We think software is the lens through which a lot ofa rt is viewed now. If you are making art that depends on proiprietary software to be appreciated, it is like what RMS used to call the Java trap...

We really rely on volunteer help. If you're doing something along these lines, we'd love to promote that as well.

Q - is there any reason to use Vista?

A - they do try to market DRM as a feature; if you want to have a 'next-generation content experience' you need to run Vista.

Q - what is the novelty in the DRM used in Vista? Maybe ther eare other mac usersw in the audience who don't know that.

A - they do a lot more signing of the driver,s controlling video output; there are more interfaces b/t the software and the hardware. This is why many peopl eneed to upgrade hardware to run Vista; they extend the scheme farther into hardware than it was before. The HD vid technologies also are enabled in Vista with restrictions (down to the hardware level).

Refs

Mako Hill, Ubuntu/Freedom Defined

Peter Brown, Defective By Design