Difference between revisions of "Archive:Open University Report Cards Meeting (7/9/09)"

From FreeCulture.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: <nowiki>what can you do in 2 weeks??? *** why things are important *** hammer down commitments *** criteria agenda - mission: to make the status of universities in relation to the Op...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<nowiki>what can you do in 2 weeks???
+
what can you do in 2 weeks???
  
*** why things are important
+
* why things are important
  
*** hammer down commitments
+
* hammer down commitments
  
*** criteria
+
* criteria
  
  
  
 
agenda
 
agenda
- mission: to make the status of universities in relation to the Open University Campaign readily available and transparent
+
* mission: to make the status of universities in relation to the Open University Campaign readily available and transparent
- timeline
+
* timeline
- committees
+
* committees:
    - research
+
** research
    - web
+
** web
    - pr (after stuff gets done and we have a product)
+
** pr (after stuff gets done and we have a product)
  
 
sponsors:
 
sponsors:
- sfc
+
* sfc
- mozilla
+
* mozilla
- cc
+
* cc
- foundations
+
* foundations
- berkman, other net/ip institutes
+
* berkman, other net/ip institutes
  
 
media:
 
media:
- bb
+
* bb
- ars
+
* ars
- /.
+
* /.
- open access news (gavin) - http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html
+
* open access news (gavin) - http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html
  
  
 
to-do:
 
to-do:
- contact GRC
+
* contact GRC
    General inquiries: info[at]endowmentinstitute.org
+
General inquiries: info[at]endowmentinstitute.org
    Media inquiries: media[at]endowmentinstitute.org
+
Media inquiries: media[at]endowmentinstitute.org
 
      
 
      
 
      
 
      
Line 92: Line 92:
 
1. Harvard's "full" report
 
1. Harvard's "full" report
 
2. Survey
 
2. Survey
Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>
+
Insert non-formatted text here

Revision as of 07:03, 8 July 2009

what can you do in 2 weeks???

  • why things are important
  • hammer down commitments
  • criteria


agenda

  • mission: to make the status of universities in relation to the Open University Campaign readily available and transparent
  • timeline
  • committees:
    • research
    • web
    • pr (after stuff gets done and we have a product)

sponsors:

  • sfc
  • mozilla
  • cc
  • foundations
  • berkman, other net/ip institutes

media:


to-do:

  • contact GRC

General inquiries: info[at]endowmentinstitute.org Media inquiries: media[at]endowmentinstitute.org


cc-licensed data exportable



site structure: mission - what are we doing? why is this important? grades methodology awards

attendance: adi wesley kevin parker richard glen

http://greenreportcard.org

We need to hammer down categories


legacy

drawback: creating animosity btwn chapters

transparency of promises


info overlap


get a couple schools out the door to figure out stuff:


43 questions


creative commons?

aclu

patents - donovan rich - oa

wesley - grc, intellectual property


To come out of this: 1. Harvard's "full" report 2. Survey Insert non-formatted text here