Difference between revisions of "Archive talk:Reading List"

From FreeCulture.org
Jump to: navigation, search
m (clarify conversation)
(Lists of lists)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
I think that having a page listing all the different kinds of media would be good, with movies, reading list, etc. each having their own page would be good.  I think just move all of the non-reading onto some other page (perhaps [[recommended]]?) would work? -- [[User:Skyfaller|Nelson]] 20:00, 4 May 2004 (PDT)
 
I think that having a page listing all the different kinds of media would be good, with movies, reading list, etc. each having their own page would be good.  I think just move all of the non-reading onto some other page (perhaps [[recommended]]?) would work? -- [[User:Skyfaller|Nelson]] 20:00, 4 May 2004 (PDT)
 +
: Sounds good. Done. --[[User:Firas|Firas]] 21:14, 4 May 2004 (PDT)
  
 
== Bibliographic data ==
 
== Bibliographic data ==
  
 
I changed the human readable information (City: Publisher, Year) with ISBN# and link to marketplace and other information. Any reason it should be otherwise? --[[User:Firas|Firas]] 20:51, 4 May 2004 (PDT)
 
I changed the human readable information (City: Publisher, Year) with ISBN# and link to marketplace and other information. Any reason it should be otherwise? --[[User:Firas|Firas]] 20:51, 4 May 2004 (PDT)

Revision as of 04:14, 5 May 2004

I hope that this becomes much more fleshed-out in the future, with more titles and reviews even ... feel free to change what I've written. -- Luke

I suggest getting this onto a page called Media or Background Information or something and having the admin delete this page (basically a renaming). Mainly because if we want to include video and audio (certainly important) it's not a Reading List anymore. --Firas 18:51, 4 May 2004 (PDT)

Lists of lists

I think that having a page listing all the different kinds of media would be good, with movies, reading list, etc. each having their own page would be good. I think just move all of the non-reading onto some other page (perhaps recommended?) would work? -- Nelson 20:00, 4 May 2004 (PDT)

Sounds good. Done. --Firas 21:14, 4 May 2004 (PDT)

Bibliographic data

I changed the human readable information (City: Publisher, Year) with ISBN# and link to marketplace and other information. Any reason it should be otherwise? --Firas 20:51, 4 May 2004 (PDT)