Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From FreeCulture.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(Further discussion on free markets)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
(Not sure who wrote the above.) And who says free markets aren't justified ideologically? --[[User:Mjg|mjg]] 12:26, 27 Apr 2004 (PDT)
 
(Not sure who wrote the above.) And who says free markets aren't justified ideologically? --[[User:Mjg|mjg]] 12:26, 27 Apr 2004 (PDT)
 
:Well, wanting to get things for less money is kind of a selfish, practical thing... Is there something more "practical" that we could use as an example? -- [[User:Skyfaller|Nelson]] 12:33, 27 Apr 2004 (PDT)
 
:Well, wanting to get things for less money is kind of a selfish, practical thing... Is there something more "practical" that we could use as an example? -- [[User:Skyfaller|Nelson]] 12:33, 27 Apr 2004 (PDT)
 
+
PLEASE, IF YOU ADD YOUR LINKS DON'T DELETE MY LINKS.IF YOU'LL DELETE MY LINKS I'LL DELETE YOURS!!!
 +
[http://www.paper-translation.com 学术翻译网]
 +
[http://www.law-translation.com 法律翻译公�]
 +
[http://www.sowang.com/translation.htm 学术翻译公�]
 +
[http://www.book-translation.com 图书翻译公�]
 +
[http://www.acmetranslation.com 上海妙文翻译公�]
 
::I guess I was aiming to get closer to [[Targeted_Advocacy#Capitalism|this point]] -- that Free Culture is not necessarily incompatible with capitalism or the profit motive given a [http://www.capitalism.org/faq/morality.htm moral justification]. --[[User:Mjg|mjg]] 10:57, 10 May 2004 (PDT)
 
::I guess I was aiming to get closer to [[Targeted_Advocacy#Capitalism|this point]] -- that Free Culture is not necessarily incompatible with capitalism or the profit motive given a [http://www.capitalism.org/faq/morality.htm moral justification]. --[[User:Mjg|mjg]] 10:57, 10 May 2004 (PDT)

Revision as of 17:36, 29 December 2004

It's confusing that this page starts out by pointing to the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and then asks "What is Open Source?". http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html is a good article to learn about the difference between the free software and open source movements. These two movements stand for very different philosophies and the free software movement looks to be far more in line with what this site is talking about.

The front page is also confusing for the same reason.

I think you'll find a suitably ethics-based explanation and critique of copyright and patent law as it applies to computer software from the FSF, not the Open Source Initiative. I'm sure many open source advocates criticise copyright and patent law and they probably do a good job of it from the perspective of the open source movement. But that movement approaches sharing and modifying software by arguing that it is suboptimal to disallow sharing and modification. The open source movement's main audience is business. The open source movement's philosophy is not compatible with the interests described on this site.

(Not sure who wrote the above.) And who says free markets aren't justified ideologically? --mjg 12:26, 27 Apr 2004 (PDT)

Well, wanting to get things for less money is kind of a selfish, practical thing... Is there something more "practical" that we could use as an example? -- Nelson 12:33, 27 Apr 2004 (PDT)

PLEASE, IF YOU ADD YOUR LINKS DON'T DELETE MY LINKS.IF YOU'LL DELETE MY LINKS I'LL DELETE YOURS!!! 学术翻译网 法律翻译公� 学术翻译公� 图书翻译公� 上海妙文翻译公�

I guess I was aiming to get closer to this point -- that Free Culture is not necessarily incompatible with capitalism or the profit motive given a moral justification. --mjg 10:57, 10 May 2004 (PDT)